![]() And I guess whole sound locks aren’t in the cards. I’m missing the pre and nei conditions, which I use pretty often. Other Audulus 3 like apps are ScaleKnow - Guitar Scales, Voice Changer Prank, 65 Country Guitar Licks and. Not all of the p-lock options that I love are here. There are five ways to play guitar chords : click the buttons indicating all the 12 major chords (F,G,C,etc.), all the 12 minor chords (Fm,Gm,Cm,etc. TouchTunes: Live Bar JukeBox is the best alternative. This module has a lot of advantages over a typical envelope follower - namely that you can scale the envelope's response to your liking (and even invert it), and you can morph between LPF->Notch->HPF filters. It should also be able to directly receive clock from a hardware device, rather than requiring an auv3 host to handle the duties. New guitar & bass-friendly effect at the Audulus forum - an envelope follower (also known as an auto-wah). It can already send note and gate data to hardware, it should be able to send a clock too. P-locks are great but I want to have the option to use the host automation when necessary.ĭrambo should have more midi clock options when running in standalone. Audulus module designer Mark Boyd in a video in his ongoing series Wired Up with Mark explains how the module works with examples highlighting each mode. A 16-step sequencer is switching between the input guitar signal, and p. I typically have to re-select Drambo in order to get sound and UI to show up.ĭrambo does not seem to respond to Cubasis automation. Implementation of the guitar effect from Muses Map of the Problematique in Audulus. It is about 90% similar to an Elektron sequencer (is it legal?), so anyone who was wondering what it would be like to have an Elektron sequencer on an ipad can satisfy their curiosity here.ĭrambo does not seem to start correctly on initial start-up in Cubasis. I have plenty of time to devote to music. Btw, making 250k working 12 shifts a month. The sequencer is obviously the star of the show. If you have any suggestions about how people can reliable monetize their music to the extent that they’re consistently making 60-70k/year, definitely let us know though. ![]() Right now I really am appreciating the FM Operator module (a great way to organize and visualize fm btw) and the Reverb is surprisingly good. It sounds pretty good! My feeling is that I would typically use it for drums/loops and “digital” sounds, although the filters and analog-ish components do have a pleasant sound. The way that modulations are created in Drambo is very efficient. ![]() Audulus can go insanely deep and is totally open ended, while Drambo keeps things a bit simpler and tends towards things that are inherently musical. I had been getting my “modular in a computer” fix from Audulus up to now, and Drambo is kind of the opposite philosophy to Audulus. It’s really cool that I can sketch an idea while I’m out and about, then upload to the cloud and plop down on my “music iPad” so I can incorporate it into the larger setup. So I’ve been messing about with Drambo for a week now, like everyone else I guess, and I have a few thoughts. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |